405
14.
and the witness
CLA
LAI PAS
1
That is he
and the
ik
Mere, stated) out
to explain the 20th August
also
Your
... bribe of any descriptions.
"Jais duce". The Sergeant
... asked the witness who "Que Face thereusion frointed
ted to the Chief Superintendent saying Captain Superintendent himself thermision said "has - hv.
The two witnesses who Superintendent."
out in general terms that bribery existed. Whether it existed or suggest Petitioners denies emphatically that he ever
With regard to the charge of neglect
to the charge of neglect of duty in not discovering and reporting
of No. 2, Wa Lane Your Petitioners Statement
gaming
douce
receives any
unbeneficial Comment of defence handed in to the Chief Superintendent amply proves Your Petitioner's
convictions for gambling
activity in this during
Laure
the
very current
15.
obtaining
...
and his succeed in
year,
1897. In conclusion Your
Petitioner humbly submits that if he were really guilty of the offence for which he has been dismissed, which however he strenuously denies, the withholding of his pension constitutes a punishment altogether in excess of what his punishment should be. He has faithfully and conscientiously served Her Majesty in Hongkong for over twenty-four years, thereby securing, as he thought, some provision in his later years to help him in the maintenance and education of
wife and
five children, who
are all in Hong Kong, and he humbly submits that nothing that he has done has disqualified him to receive that pension.
Your Petitioner therefore humbly prays
Thork
to direct that
you will be pleased
Your Petitioner's pension may be paid to him notwithstanding
his dismissal) as
is Petitioner with ever,
And your
Dated the
day of
r
aforesaid pray
YC
1897
William Baker
The
405
14.
and the witnes
.CLA
LAI PAS
1
That is he
and the
ik
Mere, sfainued) out
to Ceplain thes 20th Auquest
also
Your
bribe of any descriptions.
"Jais duce". The Sergeant
seant asked the withere who "Que Face thereusion frointed
ted to the Cofchain Superintendent enying Capitaine Superintendent himself thermision said ""has - hv.
The two witnesses who Superintendent."
out in general termes that bribery existed. Whether it evicted or suggest Petitioners denies emphatically that he ever
With regard to the clearge of neglect
to the charge of neglect of tuity in not leccovering and reporting
af No. 2, Wa Lave Your Petitioners Statement
gaming
douce
receives any
unbaneful Commer of defence handed in to the Cefilaire Surprentendent amply proves Your Petitioneré
convictions for gambling
activity in this during
Laure
the
very current
15.
obtaining
..
and his succeed in
year,
1897. In conclusion Your
Petitioner humbly subinds that if he were really quility of the offence for which he has been dismissed, which however his strenuously denies, the withholding of his passion constitutes a punishment altogether in sprose of what his punishment should be. He has faithfully and conscientiously verveen "Her allegedly in Hongkong for over luvuitif four years, thereby scouring, ons he thought, some provision in his later yours to help him in the maintenance and education of
wife and
five children, who a
are all in "Hong Kong, and he humbly submits that nothing that he has done has discutitles lein to receives that fusions.
Your Petitioner therefore lunubly firage
Thork
to direct that
you will be pleasers
Your Petitioner's pension may be paid to him notwithebanding
his dismissal) as
is Petitioner with ever,
And your
Dated the
day of r
aforesaid pray
YC
1897
William Baker
The
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.